I suppose it is all good then. 'tail check.fail' gave me the output you describe.
:-)~MIKE~(-: On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael Havens wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Michael Havens <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > The complete set of commands I issued are: >> >> #erase >> #<Extra instructions go here> >> #no erase >> ./configure --prefix=/usr >> #erase >> #<Extra instructions go here> >> #no erase >> make>>make.fail >> #erase >> #<Extra instructions go here> >> #no erase >> make check>>check.fail >> #erase >> #<Extra instructions go here> >> #no erase >> make install>>install.fail >> #erase >> #<Extra instructions go here> >> #no erase >> cat make.fail|grep fail >> cat check.fail|grep fail >> cat install.fail|grep fail >> > > Lool at the bottom of check.fail. You should see: > > ## ------------- ## > ## Test results. ## > ## ------------- ## > > 450 tests behaved as expected. > 53 tests were skipped. > > If not, erase the entire directory and re-extract the tarball. Then > > ./configure --prefix=/usr > make > make check > > Review the output and if OK > > make install > > -- Bruce > > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
