On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 07:11:09PM -0700, Michael Havens wrote:
> Hola! I am in section 7.13 and am now attempting to figure out my locale. I
> live in the United States and speak English.... well not British English,
> but anyways! So I run 'locale -a' and get this list: I am told the first
> two letters represent the language and the second two letters represent the
> country. but what about the characters after that? in my particular case I
> would choose en_US, en_US.iso88591, or en_US.utf8. If I remember correctly
> from what I've seen I should select en_US.iso88591 but I am not sure. I
> also would like to know what the differences are between the three and why
> I should select one over the other... if that is not two much trouble...
> okay after a little more looking found that:
> 
>    The only difference between en_US and en_US.utf8 is that the former uses
> ISO-8859-1 for a character set, while the latter uses UTF-8. *Prefer UTF-8.*
> The only difference in these is in what characters they are capable of
> representing. ISO-8859-1 represents characters common to many Americans
> (the English alphabet, plus a few letters with accents), whereas UTF-8
> encodes all of Unicode, and thus, just about any language you can think of.
> UTF-8, today, is a defacto standard encoding for text. (Which is why you
> should prefer it.)
> 
> I am assuming from the previous text (found here
> <http://serverfault.com/questions/605776/linux-locale-en-us-utf-8-vs-en-us>)
> that  en_US is an alias for en_US.iso88591 . It seems I am correct in that
> assumption:
> 'LC_ALL=en_US locale charmap' reveals
> ISO-8859-1
> I am thinking it is an alias! Am I correct?
> 

 It used to be.  For modern glibc, I have no idea.  Why not just use
the extra six characters and specify en_US.UTF-8 ?

ĸen
-- 
Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady.
Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to