On 1 September 2014 06:59, William Harrington <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with Ken here. when building the LFS system, you don't need to have > noatime as a mount option. > [...] > If a faster build time is required and test suites not of a concern, use > noatime.
I know the meaning of noatime. As I already said, I didn't ask this question because I absolutely want to use noatime while building, but because I want to know if and why atime is a requirement. > That is if the test suites will require a filesystem with atime. Exactly: which test suites will require atime? -- Emanuele Rusconi -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
