William Harrington wrote:
On Sep 27, 2014, at 22:54, Cifer Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
I have noticed that LFS 7.6 was released, and the kernel version
adopted is 3.16.2, it's a stable kernel.
But, LFS 7.5, using the 3.13.3 kernel when released.
Is there some rules for LFS choosing kernel version?
As far as the development cycle with the kernel, odd number minors
are unstable just as with 2.6 kernels.
2.5 unstable 2.7 unstable. 3.13 is unstable and it has and end of
life before 3.14 or 3.16.
I don’t know why 7.5 was released with a 3.13 kernel, it should have
been released with a 3.14 kernel.
Perhaps the developers can explain that one.
That's the first I've heard of that for the kernel. Is that documented
somewhere? We always take the latest stable as specified at www.kernel.org.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
