On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 12:30:10 -0500 Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hazel Russman wrote: > > The check failed overall with this result: > > > > UNRESOLVED: Build liblto-11.a > > Running /sources/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/plugin.exp . > > ............. > > === ld Summary === > > > > # of expected passes 1019 > > # of expected failures 57 > > # of unresolved testcases 1 > > # of untested testcases 1 > > /sources/binutils-build/ld/ld-new 2.24 > > Same as > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/7.6/core2duo/078-binutils-2.24 > > There are no unexpected failures here. > > -- Bruce Then why does the check log say: > -- Makefile:3671: recipe for target 'check-DEJAGNU' failed make[5]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/ld' Makefile:1866: recipe for target 'check-am' failed make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/ld' Makefile:1713: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/ld' Makefile:1868: recipe for target 'check' failed make[2]: *** [check] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/ld' Makefile:7157: recipe for target 'check-ld' failed make[1]: *** [check-ld] Error 2 I have gone through it with a fine toothcomb and there are no explicit FAILs (other than XFAILs) or ERRORs reported, only this one unresolved case. -- Hazel Russman <[email protected]> -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
