On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:20:30 +0300 Andrei Banu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I am attempting to accomplish LFS ver. 7.6 but it seems I just hit a > serious dead end. More specifically I believe the "make -k check" is > indicating a serious problem: > > > === ld Summary === > > # of expected passes 1019 > # of expected failures 57 > # of unresolved testcases 1 > # of untested testcases 1 > /sources/binutils-build/ld/ld-new 2.24 > > Makefile:3671: recipe for target 'check-DEJAGNU' failed > make[5]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1 > make[5]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/ld' > Makefile:1866: recipe for target 'check-am' failed > make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 > make[4]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/ld' > Makefile:1713: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed > make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/ld' > Makefile:1868: recipe for target 'check' failed > make[2]: *** [check] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/ld' > Makefile:7157: recipe for target 'check-ld' failed > make[1]: *** [check-ld] Error 2 > make[2]: Entering directory '/sources/binutils-build/libiberty' > make[3]: Entering directory '/sources/binutils-build/libiberty/testsuite' > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I.. > -I../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/../../include -o > test-demangle \ > ../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/test-demangle.c > ../libiberty.a > ./test-demangle < > ../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/demangle-expected > ./test-demangle: 882 tests, 0 failures > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I.. > -I../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/../../include > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -o test-pexecute \ > ../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/test-pexecute.c > ../libiberty.a > ./test-pexecute > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I.. > -I../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/../../include > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.. -o test-expandargv \ > ../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/test-expandargv.c > ../libiberty.a > ./test-expandargv > PASS: test-expandargv-0. > PASS: test-expandargv-1. > PASS: test-expandargv-2. > PASS: test-expandargv-3. > PASS: test-expandargv-4. > PASS: test-expandargv-5. > PASS: test-expandargv-6. > make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/libiberty/testsuite' > make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build/libiberty' > make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. > make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'. > make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/binutils-build' > Makefile:2124: recipe for target 'do-check' failed > make: *** [do-check] Error 2 > make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. > > > So I am having 2 questions: > 1. Please confirm: is this a failure? > 2. Do you have any idea of how to repair this? > I think this is the same problem that I had earlier. The unresolved case is treated by dejagnu as an error, but apparently it isn't a real problem. > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style -- Hazel Russman <[email protected]> -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
