On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:19:57 +0900 이승범 <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's looks like that email server filter part of email as top post. > > root:/sources/7.6/binutils-2.24# patch -Np1 -i > ../binutils-2.24-load_gcc_lto_plugin_by_default-1.patch > patching file binutils/ar.c > patching file binutils/nm.c > > root:/sources/7.6/binutils-2.24# patch -Np1 -i > ../binutils-2.24-lto_testsuite-1.patch > patching file ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp > patching file ld/testsuite/lib/ld-lib.exp > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1639 (offset -4 lines). > patching file ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp > Hunk #1 succeeded at 314 (offset -10 lines). > ... > root:/sources/7.6/binutils-build# make -k check > make[1]: Entering directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build' > make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'check-target'. > make[2]: Entering directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/etc' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. > make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/etc' > make[2]: Entering directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/intl' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. > make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/intl' > make[2]: Entering directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/libiberty' > make[2]: Entering directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/gprof' > make check-recursive > make[3]: Entering directory > '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/libiberty/testsuite' > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I.. > -I../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/../../include -o > test-demangle \ > ../../../binutils-2.24/libiberty/testsuite/test-demangle.c > ../libiberty.a > ... > Running /sources/7.6/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp ... > Running /sources/7.6/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-xc16x/xc16x.exp ... > Running /sources/7.6/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-xstormy16/xstormy16.exp > ... > Running /sources/7.6/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-xtensa/coalesce.exp ... > Running /sources/7.6/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-xtensa/lcall.exp ... > Running /sources/7.6/binutils-2.24/ld/testsuite/ld-xtensa/xtensa.exp ... > > === ld Summary === > > # of expected passes 1019 > # of expected failures 57 > # of unresolved testcases 1 > # of untested testcases 1 > /sources/7.6/binutils-build/ld/ld-new 2.24 > > Makefile:3671: recipe for target 'check-DEJAGNU' failed > make[5]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1 > make[5]: Leaving directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/ld' > Makefile:1866: recipe for target 'check-am' failed > make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2 > make[4]: Leaving directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/ld' > Makefile:1713: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed > make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/ld' > Makefile:1868: recipe for target 'check' failed > make[2]: *** [check] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build/ld' > Makefile:7157: recipe for target 'check-ld' failed > make[1]: *** [check-ld] Error 2 > make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. > make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/7.6/binutils-build' > Makefile:2124: recipe for target 'do-check' failed > make: *** [do-check] Error 2 > make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. Dejagnu treats this as an error, but the summary report shows clearly that it is not a test failure. It is an "unresolved testcase". In other words, there is something about your system that prevented the test from giving a clear result. That does not matter. You can safely install the package. If you had looked at the mailing list archives before posting, you would have seen that this problem has been raised before (by me actually!) and comprehensively answered. -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
