I upgraded an older system's version of seamonkey today and noticed that it was causing some swapping. I had 2G of RAM, but the system can take up to 4G.

I plugged it in and indeed, the bios tells me that 4G is present.

However when I boot, the kernel does not find it all.

The system is a 10 year old 686 and from dmesg:

DMI: Dell Inc. Precision WorkStation 370  /0 M3849, BIOS A04 03/16/2005

[    0.000000] 887MB LOWMEM available.
[    0.000000]   mapped low ram: 0 - 377fe000
[    0.000000]   low ram: 0 - 377fe000
[    0.000000] Zone PFN ranges:
[    0.000000]   DMA      0x00000010 -> 0x00001000
[    0.000000]   Normal   0x00001000 -> 0x000377fe
[    0.000000]   HighMem  0x000377fe -> 0x000bfe8a

[    0.000000] Memory: 3112504k/3144232k available (3678k kernel code,
                       31280k reserved, 1423k data, 340k init,
                       2234928k highmem)

In other words, Linux only sees 3112504k. I suspect a kernel misconfiguration, but what?

I know the kernel is old (3.4.1) and I can update that, but I should also be able to use that kernel version for this system.

The config is at http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/files/config-3.4.1-4

I do have CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y but don't think CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is needed. In any case I tried changing this and got no change in available memory.

I did try a commercial distro (SuSE) to see if they do any better, but they didn't. Am I just stuck with 76% of installed memory?

I will note that the 3G of memory did solve the swapping, but I should be able to access all the memory.

I also explored the BIOS a bit and hyper-threading was turned off somehow. I reset it on and that helped the browser responsiveness a bit.


  -- Bruce

--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to