On 20.11.2014 01:29, [email protected] wrote:
>  
> 
> Le 19-11-2014 19:55, Armin K. a écrit : 
> 
>> On 20.11.2014 00:49, [email protected]:
>>
>>> Hi. Here is the output of the test Makefile:2124: recipe for target 
>>> 'do-check' failed make:*** [do-check] Error 2 make: Target 'check' not 
>>> remade because of errors. Should I configure again? Thanks, Pierre
>>
>> If you examine output you'll notice that not a single test failed, but
>> rather produced an "unresolved" result for which dejagnu thinks is a


>> failure. If you do see unexpected failures, then you may have a problem.
>> Otherwise, it's safe to proceed.

I still stand by what I originally said. Key word is "unexpected",

> 
> I have got several messages similar to the one I wrote. Above them, I
> have this output: 
> 
> #of expected passes 900 
> 
> #of expected failures 4 
> 
> #of unresolved testcases 1 
> 
> #of untested testcases 1 
> 
> according to what you told me, I think I can proceed. Am I right? 
> 
> Thank you 

-- 
Note: My last name is not Krejzi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to