> > I don't have one partition, as such, on the SSD; btrfs doesn't require a >> partitioning scheme. It's true that it can exist happily on a partition, >> but one can, alternatively, give btrfs a bare drive (mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda) >> and then use the pooling benefits of the filesystem, together with >> subvolumes, quotas, and snapshots. That, for me, seemed a really nice >> feature of btrfs, and a much simpler way of using a disk. If space runs >> out then other disks can be added to the btrfs pool on the fly. RAID can >> be set up in the same manner >> > > I'm not really familiar with btrfs. Interesting. I probably need to > investigate some more.
If you have the time I would very much welcome your review of btrfs. Richard
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
