On 12/16/2014 07:20 PM, Paul Rogers wrote:
> Both have had flaws announced, seems this was the year.  The 2012 BLFS
> book has instructions for both, but AFAIK one has to choose one.  I've
> always used OpenSSL, though its reputation has been somewhat tarnished
> this year.  But maybe that means it has gotten extra buffing now?
> 
> I won't install the book's 1.0.1c, already got "j", but do you have
> particular opinions about which is best?
> 

Long story short, you install the one that the package you are trying to
build requires. They are not a drop-in replacement for each other.

-- 
Note: My last name is not Krejzi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to