> I tried to reply last week, but that mail apparently never arrived. Thanks for trying. But I take it you're not seeing it, so it's probably not the kernel. Perhaps a kernel/G33 chipset interaction.
> There were some similar posts which google found, relating to > 2.6.39 and Arch. The 2.6.39 part was an ext4 issue, which was > quickly fixed. The other thread(s) eventually established that > cron was doing something, and getting logged (in that particular > case). I saw those too, but pretty clearly irrelevant. I'm assuming that if it had turned up back in 7.2's day as a general thing, my own Google searches would have turned that up. > For ext4, the default is to write the journal every 5 seconds. Particularly at this stage, I stick with ext2. I have plenty of options that way for rooting around on the disk if something is bollixed-up. So it's not that, and it's way faster than 5sec. > touch now > # wait for a little while > find / -newer now | xargs ls -l > And then look to see what got updated. Good idea! I didn't think of that. Nothing. I've tried to think of a purpose and work backward to what would cause that. All I can think of is plugging in another HD? A USB stick would be far more likely, on my systems. > Sounds like something either introduced in 3.10 itself (i.e. > 3.10.), or a result of a later fix which was applied to -stable. When > your system is working better, you could try testing 3.10.0, and > then using git to eith bisect between 3.9 and 3.10 (linus' tree) > or between 3.10 and 3.10.62 (stable tree). Dunno, maybe I'll just finish this and go for LFS-7.6. Probably a year from now... ;-) -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - The professional email service -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
