On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 07:07:41PM +0100, Hazel Russman wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 18:42:35 +0100
> Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 06:01:02PM +0100, Hazel Russman wrote:
> > > According to the book, a failure of Test 501 (libtool test) is expected. 
> > > I also have a failure of Test 209 (parallel autotest and signal handling) 
> > > which is not in the book or in the specimen log.
> > > 
> > > This failure remains when retesting after installing automake, and also 
> > > when autoconf is built and checked with -j1. I've installed the package 
> > > anyway but I wonder if anyone else has seen this error.
> > 
> > I've not seen it, but I'll comment on "built and checked with -j1".
> > For the build, I would use -jN (for the largest value of N which is
> > useful on that particular machine), and only use -j1 for the check.
> Chapter 4.5 suggests using -j1 if any problems arise with a normal build. I 
> wanted to see if that would make any difference in this case. 

Fair enough.

> > Testsuites and -jN can be nasty (see my comments on gcc in the past
> > few months on -dev).
> > 
> > Do you still get that failure if you use fresh source ?  Many
> > testsuites do not give complete reruns, they save existing results -
> > no idea if this is one of them.
> I always use freshly untarred source in my LFS builds. Again I think this is 
> specifically recommended in the book.

Yes, but presumably you had kept the (installed) build around to
retest after installing automake (the book implies that, I think). I
just wanted to be clear that this was a fresh build which still gave
that problem.

In any case, you had to install it to be able to install automake so
I would not worry unduly.

ĸen
-- 
Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady.
Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m.
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to