On 23 October 2015 at 19:16, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Richard Melville wrote:
>>
>> On 23 October 2015 at 17:47, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard Melville wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently doing a security audit on all my LFS systems and I found
>>>> that one is running udev-181.  The question is: are there any security
>>>> issues linked with that version of udev?  I've searched the Web and I
>>>> haven't found anything untoward, but maybe somebody here knows better.
>>>> The system runs OK.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's really hard to say since udev was merged with systemd, the issues
>>> are
>>> just lumped together.
>>>
>>> You probably could update to eudev without problems.
>>
>>
>>
>>  From what I can see udev has a different structure from eudev, for
>> example, I can't see any udev hwdb files.  Is that going to cause me
>> problems or is it hard to say?
>
>
> My system has /etc/udev/hwdb.bin:
>
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 6.5M Sep  7 18:02 hwdb.bin

That's interesting; mine doesn't, and yet everything appears to work
as expected.  Is your system in question using udev rather than eudev?
 I've looked back in the book to LFS-7.1  (my old version I'm working
on) and it doesn't mention udev having hwdb files.

Richard
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to