You know I was wondering why I didn't have the kind of trouble with 5.4 that I am having with 5.5 so to make sure everything ran correctly I:
lfs@debian:/mnt/lfs/sources$ tail 5.4compilelog make[5]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../binutils-2.25.1/ld -I. -I../../binutils-2.25.1/ld -I../bfd -I../../binutils-2.25.1/ld/../bfd -I../../binutils-2.25.1/ld/../include -g -O2 -DENABLE_PLUGINS -DLOCALEDIR="\"/tools/share/locale\"" -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -g -O2 -MT eelf_k1om.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/eelf_k1om.Tpo -c -o eelf_k1om.o eelf_k1om.c mv -f .deps/eelf_k1om.Tpo .deps/eelf_k1om.Po /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -g -O2 -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -o ld-new ldgram.o ldlex-wrapper.o lexsup.o ldlang.o mri.o ldctor.o ldmain.o ldwrite.o ldexp.o ldemul.o ldver.o ldmisc.o ldfile.o ldcref.o plugin.o ldbuildid.o eelf_x86_64.o eelf32_x86_64.o eelf_i386.o ei386linux.o eelf_l1om.o eelf_k1om.o ../bfd/libbfd.la ../libiberty/libiberty.a -ldl -ldl libtool: link: gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -g -O2 -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -o ld-new ldgram.o ldlex-wrapper.o lexsup.o ldlang.o mri.o ldctor.o ldmain.o ldwrite.o ldexp.o ldemul.o ldver.o ldmisc.o ldfile.o ldcref.o plugin.o ldbuildid.o eelf_x86_64.o eelf32_x86_64.o eelf_i386.o ei386linux.o eelf_l1om.o eelf_k1om.o ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a -ldl make[4]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld' make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld' make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/ld' make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all-target'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build' lfs@debian:/mnt/lfs/sources$ I didn't get an error so I suppose all is well (I didn't script out that build).
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
