On 11/15/2015 08:40 PM, Maurious Paul wrote:
I tried building LFS on x86_64 architecture and it builds smoothly.
But when it comes to the section "5.10. GCC-5.2.0 - Pass 2", the
compilation was successful. But the problem is when I performed
a sanity check as instructed in the book to ensure that the basic
functions (compiling and linking) of the new toolchain I receive this
output as unexpected
*
*
*"[Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]"*
instead of this
"*[Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]*
Note that /tools/lib, or /tools/lib64 for 64-bit machines appears as the
prefix of the dynamic linker."
Is this correct and shall I proceed building LFS.
As mentioned on the earlier toolchain check for Glibc:
"Note that for 64-bit machines, the interpreter name will be
/tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2."
P.S. : I read some solutions regarding this issue. I have also gone through
CLFS as suggested book for x86_64. But I'm asking is it legal to build LFS
on a x86_64 system and will it work as expected or should I use CLFS to
build x86_64 LFS.
Please help me.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/prologue/architecture.html
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
