Joseph Hesse wrote:
On 11/17/2015 01:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Joseph Hesse wrote:
On 11/17/2015 12:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Have you run version-check.sh? What does it say about yacc?
Here is the output from version-check.sh
bison (GNU Bison) 3.0.4
yacc is
You do have bison. That's good, but there is a problem with yacc. What
is the full output of 'yacc --help' or 'yacc --version'? If those don't
give anything useful, then what do you get when you type 'yacc' alone on
the command line?
In any case what you will need to do (as root) is
rm /usr/bin/yacc
ln -s bison /usr/bin/yacc
or
rm /usr/bin/yacc
cat > /usr/bin/yacc << EOF
#! /bin/sh
exec '/usr/bin/bison' -y "$@"
EOF
On my host system yacc alone or yacc --help produces a vertical list of
options. yacc -V gives 1.9 20141128 (space is not an error)
I implemented your suggestion on removing yacc in /usr/bin and making yacc
a symbolic link to bison. Hopefully I won't have any more problems.
That version string indicates Berkeley yacc (byacc). It might work but
AFAIK has not been tested for LFS.
You should be good to go now.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
