Paul Rogers wrote:
Running the Ch4 prereqs I find the following deficiencies:
yacc links to bison: yacc not found <--- easily fixed
gawk >= 4.0.1: GNU Awk 3.1.7
glibc >= 2.5.1: (GNU libc) 2.12
grep >= 2.5.1a: grep (GNU grep) 2.20
texinfo >= 4.7: info (GNU texinfo) 4.13
xz >= 5.0.0: xz (XZ Utils) 4.999.9beta
Since these are only needed to build the Stage1 throwaway code,
the one that looks like it may be a showstopper is the glibc.
Opinions? Is it worth giving it a shot? (Having to upgrade,
update, add packages to CentOS just to get back to the starting
line would be something of a PITA.)
Why don't you build Chapter 5 on a system that has the proper tools and
copy /mnt/lfs/tools to the CentOS system?
Actually the only differences between systems of the same primary
architecture (e.g. x86_64) should be in Chapter 7's customization files
(fstab, hostname, etc) and the drivers in the kernel.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
