On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 05:32:10PM -0800, Paul Rogers wrote: > Just checking, this *looks* OK, but it's different than the book. > Book says: > If everything is working correctly, there should be no errors, and the > output of the last command will be of the form: > > [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2] > > Note that /tools/lib, or /tools/lib64 for 64-bit machines appears as the > prefix of the dynamic linker. > > What I get is: > lfs:/pod/glibc-build$ readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools' > [Requesting program interpreter: > /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2] > lfs:/pod/glibc-build$ > > The book doesn't say "-x86-64" could be in the loader filename, but it > doesn't *look* wrong. >
Already noted in 7.8. > [It's nice to have 1SBU=28.6sec. :-) I remember 25 MINUTES.] From anybody else, I would swear - on my i3, SBUs last year were 110 to 120 seconds, and on my A10 Kaveri the wrong side of 150 seconds (albeit using current, or immediately previous, version of gcc - newer versions seem to get slower, and with ondemand cpufreq). But for you, I'm happy that you can now build quickly - less reason to stick with old versions ;-) PS good luck with with your vision. ĸen -- This email was written using 100% recycled letters. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
