> Binutils, GCC, and GLIBC default to -O2 -g for optimization. GLIBC
> requires some option of optimization. Those aren't seen with the gcc
> command line. Did you set CFLAGS to remove those default
> optimizations?
Nope. I have in the past when building BLFS, say on a 686 for a system
I want to be compatible with a 586. Some configures presume you're
building for at least the current architecture, but I have often built
on the fastest box I can for running on something much more modest, i.e.
using the i7 to build LO for an i686 target. I generally have
C{HOST,TARGET}, {C,C++}FLAGS set in root's variables to the lowest
common denominator for the sort of hardware I'm building for, X86_64 in
this case, and IIRC they were in the initial setup of the lfs user, but
caused an early conflict, so have been removed.
OOPS! There they are. Thanks William.
CLOSED, user flub.
--
Paul Rogers
[email protected]
Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
(I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL
:-)
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
