On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:57:55PM +0200, Michael D. L. wrote: > On 04/11/2016 03:46 PM, Keith Howard wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > I am using Knoppix 7, 2016 version as a host system. > > I am following the LFS-systemd 7.9 book. > > I have an AMD Athlon X2 system with 1GB of RAM. > > > > > > 'file -L liblto_plugin.so' indeed, shows that is a 64 bit binary....but > > I thought we were compiling for $LFS_TGT, which is > > 'x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu' > > > > Hi Keith, > > I'm just writing you because nobody has so far - and I'm really a newbie > when it comes to 32/64-bit CPU's, dists and compiling. > > Is your CPU a 64-Bit? > > x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu means 64-Bit (and most of the time it just says > x86_64-unknown-linux) > > Both host CPU and Dist has to be 64-Bit in order to compile a 64-Bit LFS > System. > > Best Regards > Michael > Michael, thanks for prompting me to take another look at this (I don't touch systemd, was not sure if perhaps the build was different - but this early on, there is not much that can differ).
Keith - What does 'file' say about the programs you have compiled so far ? It should say they are all ELF 64-bit, but at least one of them is not. Looking at my (sysvinit) logs, the following seem worth exploring: /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-ld (binutils pass 1) /tools/bin/x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc (gcc pass 1) /tools/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (glibc) /tools/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.21 (libstdc++) /tools/bin/strings (binutils pass 2) ĸen -- This email was written using 100% recycled letters. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
