On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:17 PM, akhiezer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:05:23 +0100 > > From: (akhiezer) > > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Glibc test error - Generating locale > > de_DE.ISO-8859-1 > > > > > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:56:12 -0400 > > > From: Nathan Bibb <[email protected]> > > > Subject: [lfs-support] Glibc test error - Generating locale > de_DE.ISO-8859-1 > > > > > > I am building LFS version 7.9 (stable) on a very outdated machine, and > > > everything was going well until Chapter 6.9 Glibc-2.23. > > > > > > I am building on a Debian 7.5 host, and I have attached the output of > > > version-check.sh. I searched for the error on the forums and on > google, to > > > no avail. > > > > > > It is worth noting that I am building on a VERY underpowered machine > > > (Pentium-MMX 166MHZ with 64M ram). My Debian install is upgraded from > a > > > clean 5.0.8 install, due to the fact that the newer installation medium > > > require the CMOV instruction in the processor, which the Pentium MMX > lacks. > > > > > > Configure and Make ran without error, but when I ran 'make check', the > > > process failed with the following error: > > > > > > Generating locale de_DE.ISO-8859-1: this might take a while... > > > localedef: ../sysdeps/x86_64/cacheinfo.c:262: handle_intel: Assertion > > > Excuse me maybe being a bit dumb: but why does that say 'x86_64' > if you're on a pentium-mmx ? > > That is a great question, to which I have no answer :) I am actually re-running the steps for glibc now, so maybe I will have more information to help troubleshoot. I deleted the extracted folder, re-extracted from the source archive, and closely followed the steps in the chapter. I configured without an issue and I am now running 'make'. I did not pipe the output to a log file, unfortunately, but I will make sure I capture the tail of the make output. It should be done in about 8 or 9 hours. > > > > `maxidx >= > > > 2' failed. > > > > > > A quick websearch indicates that one cause may be re host libc vs > > hardware level - see e.g. thread that contains (& note that both it > > and your error-message mention cache): > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2010/06/msg00069.html > > > > > > > ../localedata/gen-locale.sh: line 29: 18598 Aborted > > > ${localedef_before_env} ${run_program_env} I18NPATH=../localedata > > > ${localedef_after_env} --quiet -c -f $charmap -i $input > > > ${common_objpfx}localedata/$out > > > Charmap: "ISO-8859-1" Inputfile: "de_DE" Outputdir: "de_DE.ISO-8859-1" > > > failed > > > /bin/sh: line 3: > > > > /sources/glibc-2.23/build/localedata/de_DE.ISO-8859-1/LC_CTYPE.test-result: > > > No > > > such file or directory > > > ../gen-locales.mk:17: recipe for target > > > '/sources/glibc-2.23/build/localedata/de_DE.ISO-8859-1/LC_CTYPE' failed > > > make[2]: *** > > > [/sources/glibc-2.23/build/localedata/de_DE.ISO-8859-1/LC_CTYPE] > > > Error 1 > > > make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/glibc-2.23/localedata' > > > Makefile:214: recipe for target 'localedata/tests' failed > > > make[1]: *** [localedata/tests] Error 2 > > > make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/glibc-2.23' > > > Makefile:9: recipe for target 'check' failed > > > make: *** [check] Error 2 > > > > > > Any help you can provide would be appreciated. If no one has a clue, I > > > will just move forward with 'make install' and see what happens :) > > > > > -- > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
