On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:25:49PM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > On 06/17/2016 04:12 PM, Paul Rogers wrote: > > > > > ldd /bin/bash shows: > > > > > > > > > > linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe871bf000) > > > > > libreadline.so.6 => /lib/libreadline.so.6 (0x00007fa9061a8000) > > > > > libhistory.so.6 => /lib/libhistory.so.6 (0x00007fa905fa0000) > > > > > libncursesw.so.6 => /lib/libncursesw.so.6 (0x00007fa905d36000) > > > > > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fa905b32000) > > > > > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fa905791000) > > > > > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fa9063ed000) > > > > Do you get any similar error when just running "/bin/bash"? > > > Yes, I receive the same error. > > So do all of those libraries exist? IANM, you'll get the same message > > if one of the libraries it needs isn't found. > > All exist but for linux-vdso.so.1. However, I responded to the /bin/bash > question wrong. I do NOT receive the error with "/bin/bash." My mistake.
With current binutils, if libfoo.so.7 is not present then ldd says something like 'not found' after the soname, instead of => /usr/lib/libfoo.so.7 (hexdigits) But I'm still none the wiser about what is wrong, and casting around for whatever we are all overlooking. If you can invoke a new shell with /bin/bash without the message, do you get the message when you try to invoke /bin/sh ? And can you do things like /bin/bash SomeScript.sh without the message ? Ditto for /bin/sh ? ĸen -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
