akhiezer wrote:
From: Hazel Russman <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 25 Aug
2016 17:28:07 +0100 Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.10 rc1. Tool
chain technical notes 5.2
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:54:46 -0500 Bruce Dubbs
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hazel Russman wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:18 +0200 Pierre Labastie
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 25/08/2016 12:32, Hazel Russman wrote:
There seem to be a couple of typos in the paragraph on
building glibc. The --host parameter would be $LFS_TGT which
evaluates (for a 32-bit system) to i686-lfs-linux-gnu, not
i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc as written.
I guess you mean the sentence "The compiler is generally not
an issue since Glibc will always use the compiler relating to
the /|--host|/ parameter passed to its configure script, e.g.
in our case, i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc". I trust you about
English, but for me, the "e.g." may as well refer to the
compiler...
Yes, I was hasty. The second reference (to CC) is correct. The
first, which you quoted, is definitely ambiguous. As phrased, it
could refer either to the --host parameter itself or to the
compiler which configure chooses as a consequence. May I suggest
a small emendation for clarity: "...configure script. In our
case, this compiler will be i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc."
I don't understand. We now say:
The compiler is generally not an issue since Glibc will always use
the compiler relating to the --host parameter passed to its
configure script, e.g. in our case, i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc.
LC_ALL=C TZ=UTC0 diff -Naur /tmp/txt.{orig,neue}
> --- /tmp/txt.orig 2016-08-25 18:30:39.371000002 +0000
> +++ /tmp/txt.neue 2016-08-25 18:31:37.441000002 +0000
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> The compiler is generally not> an issue since Glibc will always use the
-compiler relating to the --host parameter passed to its configure script,
> -e.g. in our case, i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc.
+compiler relating to the --host parameter passed to its configure script;
> +e.g. in our case, the compiler will be i686-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc.
OK, I used this in revision 11115. It will be in 7.10.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
