Il 01 nov 2016 1:38 AM, "Douglas R. Reno" <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Michele Bucca <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>
>> >> On Tuesday, 1 November 2016, Michele Bucca <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > The cross-toolchain is extremely stripped down, and doesn't
include several libraries that many packages will need to compile. It is
also setup for a different target - we do that to isolate the final system
from the host and ensure that there are no dependencies on libraries from
the host.
>> >>>
>> >>> Can These libraries that are not included  be added later and built
separately?
>> >>
>> >> I have never tried, but I would say it would require a lot of
customisation, basically I would say it is so hard, but probably possible.
You would need to edit current binaries, adjust config, and if you want to
delete /tools, well you get the idea.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think that it would take more time to accomplish this than it would
to complete the entirety of Chapter 6 w/out tests.
>>
>> Ok, is there a way to stop the compile process and resume it later, eg
the next day? I can't leave my laptop on for 8 hours
>
> I think that it is possible.
>
> Ctrl-C it and then run "make" again later. I've done it, but I don't
recall the safety of the endeavor. I know it worked at one time though.
>
> --
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> Do not top post on this list.
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>
Thanks, if someone else knows other details about the safety of stopping
and continuing a gcc build that would be apreciated

-- Michele
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to