Hi all,

I just noticed that there are changes in the development version of LFS, related to x86_64 architecture. But i do miss the rationale and/or more explanation. The latter is important because I see several changes which make sense, but misses other related changes in various other packages. Also having now /lib64 as a directory instead of a link puzzles me. The more because /lib is still a directory and not a link to /lib64 as per FHS 3.0.

Looking at the FHS 3.0 documentation does not help either since the new LFS directory structure seems to be a non-consistent mix of various possibilities. See above and next example: /usr/lib with redundant link /usr/lib64.

Also glad to see that what I proposed in 2014 is now taking shape.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to