On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Hazel Russman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:55:56 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hazel Russman wrote: > > > I am building LFS on a Sony laptop. It is the first LFS I have built on > > > this machine, in fact the first I have ever built for a non-intel > > > processor. > > > > > > There are 8 failures in the glibc tests, mostly in math (which the book > > > suggests are to be expected on non-intel/non-amd chips). The 2 getaddr > > > failures are also expected. But I also have fails in csu/test-multiarch > > > and nss/test-netdb. Are these significant? > > > > That's hard to say without analyzing the actual failures. However 8 > > failures out of 2500 tests in a complex library like glibc is probably > not > > significant. The tests most likely make some implicit assumptions that > > the processor does not satisfy. > > > > -- Bruce > I have now checked the out files. nss/netdb gets timed out. I shall try it > again with TIMEOUTFACTOR set and see if that makes any difference. > > csu/test-multiarch fails to find one of the cpu's architecture flags. > [code] > Checking HAS_CPU_FEATURE (SSSE3): > init-arch 0 > cpuinfo (ssse3) 1 > *** failure *** > [code] > > /proc/cpuinfo shows ssse3 flag is set. > @Douglas Reno: This also shows that /proc directory is correctly mounted. > OK, I just wanted to make sure of that. A thread on LQ suggested it. I'd hope that it isn't actually trying to use that flag in the compiler. That could lead to a sticky situation of unexecutable code.
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
