Hey folks,

Thanks again for help on my first posting..

Meanwhile I've made it to chapter 6 and ironed out some problems I've caused 
myself. 

I had to start over once  with the backup I've made at the end of chapter 5, 
but now everything seems correctly set up. 

But...
When trying to build inetutils 1.9.4, I get this error message:

=====
In file included from system.c:23:0:
system/linux.c: In function 'pnd_read':
system/linux.c:415:15: error: 'PATH_PROCNET_DEV' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
   fp = fopen (PATH_PROCNET_DEV, "r");
               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
system/linux.c:415:15: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once 
for each function it appears in
In file included from system.c:23:0:
system/linux.c: In function 'linux_if_nameindex':
system/linux.c:917:24: error: 'PATH_PROCNET_DEV' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
   content = read_file (PATH_PROCNET_DEV, &length);
                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[3]: *** [Makefile:1516: system.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/sources/inetutils-1.9.4/ifconfig'
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1536: all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/inetutils-1.9.4/ifconfig'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1491: all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/inetutils-1.9.4'
make: *** [Makefile:1428: all] Error 2
root:/sources/inetutils-1.9.4# 
=====

First I thought I've made a mistake again, but so far I couldn't find anything 
suspicious...

With a quick web search I found a patch for v1.9.1 ( https://git.congatec.com/
yocto/meta-openembedded/commit/3402bfac6b595c622e4590a8ff5eaaa854e2a2a3 ) but 
I don't want to apply it (or add the missing definition by hand) before asking 
the gurus ;-) 

I hope I didn't mess something up (again) that may be the cause for this 
problem :-)

Thanks, Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to