On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:28:07 -0600
Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hazel Russman wrote:
> > In the search paths, the book says:
> > "References to paths that have components with '-linux-gnu' should be
> > ignored, but otherwise the output of the last command should be:
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib64")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/local/lib64")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/lib64")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib64")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/local/lib")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/lib")
> > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib");"
> >
> > In fact this list includes the -linux-gnu items, so the introductory
> > sentence is unnecessary. It obviously came over from Chapter 5, where
> > it refers to paths that still include the /tools prefix.
>
> What's wrong with the introductory sentence? The -linux-gnu directories
> do not exist.
>
> -- Bruce
But they do! They're in the printed list above (1st and 5th item) and they
appear in my list too. Or am I seeing things?
--
H Russman
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
