Mark Pokorny wrote:
On 19 February 2017 at 22:28, Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
Hazel Russman wrote:
In the sanity tests for glibc, the book says:
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
Note that /lib is now the prefix of our dynamic linker.
The output is as shown but the explanation is confusing. The linker is
indeed in /lib but the output actually says
/lib64, referring to the symbolic link.
OK, I'll clarify that.
I am currently building an LFS-8.0 (systemd) (having already built
LFS-7.10) and have just come to this section. Hasn’t the /lib64 → /lib
symlink been removed in this version of the book (i.e. /lib64 is now a
full-blown directory in its own right)?
I don't understand your question.
$ ls -ld /lib64
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 13 19:28 /lib64
ls -l /lib64
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Feb 13 19:28 ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ->
../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Feb 13 19:28 ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 ->
../lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
