Now that I've got LFS 8.0 up and running with X, I'm trying to address
various issues:
###########
Upon booting, the login prompt "komodo login:" appears in the normal
way, but after 2-3 seconds a kernel message appears on the login line:
###
komodo login: [ 13.543691] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps
Full Duplex,
Flow Control: Rx/Tx
[ 13.543750] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s31f6: link becomes ready
####
I can login ok and start X Windows.
The /var/log/kern.log file has this at the end:
####
May 27 15:14:38 komodo kernel: [ 8.414901] EXT4-fs (dm-6): mounted
filesystem with
ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
May 27 15:14:39 komodo kernel: [ 10.506552] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP):
enp0s31f6: link is
not ready
May 27 15:14:39 komodo kernel: [ 10.507233] ip (3842) used greatest
stack depth: 12616
bytes left
May 27 15:14:42 komodo kernel: [ 13.543691] e1000e: enp0s31f6 NIC Link
is Up 1000 Mbps
Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
May 27 15:14:42 komodo kernel: [ 13.543750] IPv6:
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s31f6: link
becomes ready
May 27 15:20:14 komodo kernel: [ 345.737146] kworker/dying (49) used
greatest stack depth:
12456 bytes left
May 27 17:18:12 komodo kernel: [ 7422.957209] kworker/dying (26988) used
greatest stack
depth: 12136 bytes left
####
Obviously what I'm seeing is not normal behavior -- not fatal, but annoying.
Ideas?
###########
###########
Firefox (and Thunderbird) starts ok with root login, but not user login.
There is also an error message about "pixbuf" that I don't understand.
Take a look:
####
root [ ~ ]# firefox
(firefox:4512): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not load a pixbuf from
/org/gtk/libgtk/theme/Adwaita/assets/check-symbolic.svg.
This may indicate that pixbuf loaders or the mime database could not be
found.
GLib-GIO-Message: Using the 'memory' GSettings backend. Your settings
will not be saved or
shared with other applications.
root [ ~ ]# su - lfs
lfs [ ~ ]$ firefox
No protocol specified
Unable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused
Error: cannot open display: :0
####
Firefox and Thunderbird work fine with root startup; I can copy LFS
commands from the BLFS book to an xterm and execute them in the normal
way, and send/receive email as root.
###########
###########
To be thorough, I wanted to recompile some of the LFS software and make
sure that some tests that failed first time around work ok in the real
environment. I started with glibc. It compiled and checked ok, but
install failed.
Test results:
#######
XPASS: conform/UNIX98/ndbm.h/linknamespace
XPASS: conform/XOPEN2K/ndbm.h/linknamespace
XPASS: conform/XOPEN2K8/ndbm.h/linknamespace
XPASS: conform/XPG4/ndbm.h/linknamespace
UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-audit10
XPASS: elf/tst-protected1a
XPASS: elf/tst-protected1b
UNSUPPORTED: math/test-double-libmvec-alias-avx512
UNSUPPORTED: math/test-double-libmvec-alias-avx512-main
UNSUPPORTED: math/test-double-libmvec-sincos-avx512
UNSUPPORTED: math/test-float-libmvec-alias-avx512
UNSUPPORTED: math/test-float-libmvec-alias-avx512-main
UNSUPPORTED: math/test-float-libmvec-sincosf-avx512
UNSUPPORTED: nptl/test-cond-printers
UNSUPPORTED: nptl/test-condattr-printers
UNSUPPORTED: nptl/test-mutex-printers
UNSUPPORTED: nptl/test-mutexattr-printers
UNSUPPORTED: nptl/test-rwlock-printers
UNSUPPORTED: nptl/test-rwlockattr-printers
Summary of test results:
2656 PASS
13 UNSUPPORTED
39 XFAIL
6 XPASS
make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/glibc-2.25'
lfs [ /sources/glibc-2.25/build ]$ ll /etc/ld.so
#######
I'm not sure what to make of these results.
Install failure:
#######
root [ /sources/glibc-2.25 ]# make install
Makeconfig:42: *** missing separator. Stop.
root [ /sources/glibc-2.25 ]#
root [ /sources/glibc-2.25 ]# make install
Makeconfig:42: *** missing separator. Stop.
Makeconfig lines 41-43:
###
else
objdir must be defined by the build-directory Makefile.
endif
###
#######
Ideas?
###########
Alan
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
