jfl wrote:
please don't ever go to systemd exclusively. the reason i'm here at lfs -
finally - is to get away from systemd. you might poll the people who've
actually built an lfs system for their opinions. i personally wouldn't
mind at all if you spent the time you're spending on systemd on other
aspects of the system. everything about systemd stinks of big brother.
that's just this one man's opinion, of course.
Please don't top post.
I lean toward your point of view but there are quite a few users that have
quite the opposite opinion.
Note that there are only two packages in the systemd version of the book
that are not in the sysv version. Thanks to one of our developers (DJ),
the books use a common source tree. With that, less than 10% of the
source differs between the books. The cost in terms of maintenance time
between the two versions is really quite minimal for now.
The larger difference is in BLFS where the systemd version has gnome
(which requires systemd or a lot of hacks).
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
