On 10/19/17 12:39 AM, Gdsi wrote:
Hi.
After 8 hour work ch.6.20. GCC-7.2.0 result was
Summaries (gcc, libatomic, libgomp, libitm,) equal,
except::---------
     My=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes            11695
# of unexpected failures        5
# of expected failures          66
# of unsupported tests          294

     lfs === libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes            11789
# of unexpected failures        5
# of expected failures          66
# of unsupported tests          247
-------------
I have not clarity  ("As of version 4.3.0, GCC now unconditionally installs the 
'limits.h' file into the private 'include-fixed' directory, and that directory is 
required to be in place."), but my 'limits.h' sets into /mnt/lfs/tools/include/, and 
'include-fixed' not at all.
May I go on?
Thank.

Hi Gdsi,

You need to include the actual output of the failures, otherwise we can't tell if the failures are to be ignored.

As noted in the book, you can compare the test-results with those of others:

          Results can be compared with those located 
athttp://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/8.1/
          andhttp://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/.
          A few unexpected failures cannot always be avoided. The GCC
          developers are usually aware of these issues, but have not resolved
          them yet. In particular, five tests in the libstdc++ test suite are
          known to fail when running as the root user as we do here. Unless
          the test results are vastly different from those at the above URL,
          it is safe to continue.


The limits.h file will be present in (/mnt/lfs)/usr/include - this is normal.

The limits.h file mentioned in the Note, is located at a different location:

(/mnt/lfs)/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.2.0/include-fixed.


Best regards

  Michael

--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to