Pedro wrote:
> I attached files for configure, make, make check and a screenshot.
>
> 'make' gave this onscreen warning (circunflex included):
> pmap.c:135:36: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unassigned type [-Woverflow]
> static unsigned KLONG range_hight = ~=ul
Is this a 32-bit system?
Yes
I don't have a 32-bit system to validate, but that is probably the reason
for the test failure. I'd ignore it.
By the way, ~ is a tilde, not a circumflex.
I meant the circumflex under the tilde, it was also part of the warning
It you mean the ^ under static, then that is a carat. But I see that in
some places it is known as a circumflex if it is placed over a character.
----------
Programming lesson:
Actually the output of the line does not reflect the actual line:
static unsigned KLONG range_high = ~0ull;
On a 32-bit system KLONG is defined as 'long' (32-bit word) and the
compiler is complaining about a constant ~0ull which is a long long or a
64-bit (minimum) word of all ones treated as unsigned.
The compiler warning is that a 64-bit constant is being assigned to a
32-bit word.
---------
Please respond to the list and not just me personally.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
