On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Alan Corey wrote:
> Like
> aarch64-lfs-linux-gnu-as.1
> or did I screw up again?
>
For (pseudo) cross-compiling (i.e. pass 1), that is ok.
> In /mnt/lfs/tools/bin I have a set of executables with names like
> aarch64-lfs-linux-gnu-as and in
> /mnt/lfs/tools/aarch64-lfs-linux-gnu/bin there's another set with
> normal names. Neither are symlinks to the other.
>
Use ls -i : they should be hardlinks to the same inode.
[...]
>
> I just finished /lfs/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html I didn't try very
> hard to figure out what
>
> case $(uname -m) in
> x86_64) mkdir -v /tools/lib && ln -sv lib /tools/lib64 ;;
> esac
>
> Is for because I'm not an x86_64 user. Should I have done something
> similar for aarch64? It links something, that's all I know.
>
It all depends on the expected linker and library directories. For
x86_64 the initial expectation was multilib, so 64-bit libraries and
their linker are in {$PREFIX,}/lib64 - on LFS we do not support
multilib, everything can happily live in /lib with the symlink and
other step(s) shown for x86_64.
But my google-fu doesn't let me find out what the expected
directory/linker is (searching for linker got me to ld scripts and
information from gcc on the two -mabi variants for 32bit, 64bit,
searching for loader got me information on boot images).
So, I think it is VERY likely that you need the lib64 symlinks. But
if you get to glibc in chapter 6 I have no idea what the equivalent
of ld-linux should be.
Ah! Searching for aarch64 ld-linux got hits for
ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 so that is probably the correct name,
Confirmatory details at https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/80431/
ĸen
--
Keyboard not found, Press F1 to continue
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
