On 2018-07-15 09:17 -0400, Alan Corey wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 08:49:19PM -0400, Alan Corey wrote:
> > > Would it be correct to replace x86_64 in your documentation bash scripts
> > > with `uname -m`? Because of course everybody knows ARM is the way of the
> > > future. :)
> > >
> > > But seriously, I'm not always sure what to relace. Or maybe you could put
> > > them all on one page? It wouldn't detract from the flow of the main page
> > > much that way.
> > >
> >
> > You think we know the details for architectures we don't use ?
> >
>
> Oh, that seems simple enough, you put the ones you know on a web page and
> at the bottom appears a dedicated email address people can send them to.
> You'd probably get a few bogus ones, but look through them once a week or
> so and update the page.
I can tell, at least we have to modify gcc-pass1 and gcc-pass2 to make the
commands changing dynamic linker location working for other architectures.
Maybe:
sed 's@/lib[^/]*/ld[^:]*so@/tools&@g' -i `grep -lr ld.so gcc/config`
And the condition creating symlink /{tools,usr}/lib64 -> lib also need to
be modified for other architectures with multilib.
By the way, is CLFS dead now? I remeber CLFS supports many architectures.
--
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
