El 2018-09-10 15:48, Douglas R. Reno escribió:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 2:19 AM José Carlos Carrión Plaza <[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi co-listers:

First of all, thanks for your great work on LFS-8.3.

I'm building LFS-8.3 on an:

IBM eServer 206m -[8485E1G]-/M11ip/M11ix, BIOS IBM BIOS Version
1.45-[PAE145AUS-1.45]- 01/23/2009

with a

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (family: 0xf, model: 0x4,
stepping: 0x9)

and S.O.: Linux From Scratch 8.1

When I "make check" binutils-2.31.1, I've got only one unexpected
error,
but it seems not in "debug_msg.sh" like the book reads. It appears
like:

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
=== ld tests ===

Schedule of variations:
unix

Running target unix
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description
file
for target.
Using /tools/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file
for
target.
Using /sources/binutils-2.31.1/ld/testsuite/config/default.exp as
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/sources/binutils-2.31.1/ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/aarch64-elf.exp ...
[...]
Running
/sources/binutils-2.31.1/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/export-class.exp ...
Running /sources/binutils-2.31.1/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp ...
FAIL: Build ifunc-1a with -z ibtplt
Running /sources/binutils-2.31.1/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/no-plt.exp ...
Running /sources/binutils-2.31.1/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/tls.exp ...
[...]
=== ld Summary ===

# of expected passes        1843
# of unexpected failures    1
# of expected failures        4
# of untested testcases        1
# of unsupported tests        20
/sources/binutils-2.31.1/build/ld/ld-new 2.31.1
))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

May I continue with the Chapter 6 or I have to back on Chapter 5?

Thanks in advance.

Regards

--
José Carlos Carrión Plaza
Universidad de Murcia

--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Keep on going, that's expected.



Thanks. I'll do it.

J.C.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to