On Oct 23, 2018, at 07:19 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote: On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 06:08:34PM -0600, Hans Malissa wrote: On Oct 23, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
As always with testsuites, the detail can happen a lot earlier. My run of make check on that machine was logged, and the first 12 lines, up to the point where it started to compile test progs, were: make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. true DO=all multi-do # make make btest stest ztest edtest ttest ctestg ctesta make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. make[2]: Entering directory '/building/gcc-8.2.0/build/fixincludes' autogen -T ../../fixincludes/check.tpl ../../fixincludes/inclhack.def make[2]: autogen: Command not found make[2]: *** [Makefile:176: check] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory '/building/gcc-8.2.0/build/fixincludes' make[1]: *** [Makefile:3674: check-fixincludes] Error 2 make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'check'. make[3]: Entering directory '/building/gcc-8.2.0/build/libbacktrace' The Error 127 (no such file) translates becomes Error 2 in the check-fixincludes target, and that (plus any other errors, if there were any - not in your case) carries through to the final status. ĸen
Okay, I redirected the output of make -k check to a file, and I do indeed get something similar, the same ‘Error 127’, right in the beginning: make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/gcc-8.2.0/build' make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/gcc-8.2.0/build/fixincludes' autogen -T ../../fixincludes/check.tpl ../../fixincludes/inclhack.def make[2]: autogen: Command not found make[2]: *** [Makefile:176: check] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/gcc-8.2.0/build/fixincludes' make[1]: *** [Makefile:3674: check-fixincludes] Error 2 So that seems to be comparable to what you got. Does that mean that I can go ahead and install gcc-8.2.0 or is something wrong? Yes, install it, nothing is wrong. For more on autogen, see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29700 http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/autogen There is no way that can be built at this early stage (it appears to need libguile, libxml2, libregex). ĸen Great, thanks for the explanation. This sounds to me as if everyone should get the same error, since nobody would have autogen at this stage. Hans
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
