On 12/06/2018 03:13 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 09:38:56PM +0100, Thomas Trepl wrote:

I use allways 12GB disk space for partitions to build LFS in - so
nearly all available disks nowadays should be fine. A 32GB mSATA is a
bit small, but every size above should be fine also. But that depends
on what else you want to have on disk beside LFS.


To quote Marvin: It amazes me how you manage to live in anything that
small.

For a server, yeah, fine.  But for a desktop, particularly if trying
extra or alternative packages, it's a bit small.  My most recent
normal desktop took 9.49GB, but then I installed texlive (source,
without asymptote, biber, xindy) and got to 15.1GB.

And I've got over 11GB of tarballs and zip files in /sources
(ignoring fonts).

And anyone using LFS long-term really needs at least two systems
(current and next), plus (of course) /home, space for sources, and
somewhere to build.

I'm currently doing a scripted install of the new Qt5 after manually
building it to check the details - the build (without WebEngine) took
12GB.  For small packages, building in /tmp (half of available RAM)
might be ok - but don't try that on Qt, rustc, webkitgtk, firefox,
seamonkey, or libreoffice.

I usually use 10G for LFS, but then there's this mount thingy...


SOURCE         TARGET         FSTYPE     SIZE   USED  AVAIL USE%
lfs82:/srv/src /usr/src       nfs        246G 170.8G  62.6G  69%
/dev/sda2      /boot          ext2       185M 180.1M      0  97%
/dev/sda4      /              ext4       9.7G   8.8G 460.8M  90%
/dev/sda7      /home          ext4      27.4G  17.5G   8.4G  64%
/dev/sda9      /tmp           ext4       9.7G   6.2G     3G  63%
/dev/sda12     /opt           ext4       9.7G     5G   4.3G  51%
/dev/sdb3      /mnt/lfs       ext4       9.7G   3.9G   5.3G  40%
/dev/sdb6      /usr/share     ext4       9.8G   4.8G   4.5G  48%
/dev/sdb12     /mnt/qemu      ext4     295.2G 224.1G    56G  76%


  -- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to