Content of /source/glibc-2.28/build/stdlib/test-bz22786.test-result:
FAIL: stdlib/test-bz22786
original exit status 1

---Original---
From: "lfs-support-request"<[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Jan 14, 2019 04:00 AM
To: "lfs-support"<[email protected]>;
Subject: lfs-support Digest, Vol 1064, Issue 1


Send lfs-support mailing list submissions to
[email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lfs-support digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Glibc-2.28 tests (=?ISO-8859-1?B?QW5vbnltb3Vz?=)
   2. Re: Glibc-2.28 tests (Pierre Labastie)
   3. Re: Glibc-2.28 tests (Bruce Dubbs)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:15:37 +0800
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?QW5vbnltb3Vz?=" <[email protected]>
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?bGZzLXN1cHBvcnQ=?="
<[email protected]>
Subject: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.28 tests
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,
I'm getting some unexpected test failure in glibc(8.3-systemd, chapter 6.9)
make check result:
Summary of test results:
3 FAIL
5837 PASS
17 UNSUPPORTED
17 XFAIL
2 XPASS


3 Fail:
inet/tst-idna_name_classify
misc/tst-ttyname
stdlib/test-bz22786


inet/tst-idna_name_classify and misc/tst-ttyname are mentioned in the book, but 
not stdlib/test-bz22786.
My question is: test stdlib/test-bz22786 failed is safe to continue to building 
LFS target system?
Also, have any method to fix this error, I doing some research but not resolve 
this problem.


Wen Tao Li
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/attachments/20190113/dbf9e589/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 08:00:04 +0100
From: Pierre Labastie <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.28 tests
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

On 13/01/2019 07:15, Anonymous wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm getting some unexpected test failure in glibc(8.3-systemd, chapter 6.9)
> make check result:
> Summary of test results:
> 3 FAIL
> 5837 PASS
> 17 UNSUPPORTED
> 17 XFAIL
> 2 XPASS
> 
> 3 Fail:
> inet/tst-idna_name_classify
> misc/tst-ttyname
> stdlib/test-bz22786

I too have 3 FAIL, but the third one is not the same (nptl/tst-eintr1). I felt
safe to continue. I think you should be safe too...

> 
> inet/tst-idna_name_classify and misc/tst-ttyname are mentioned in the book,
> but not stdlib/test-bz22786.
> My question is: test stdlib/test-bz22786 failed is safe to continue to
> building LFS target system?
> Also, have any method to fix this error, I doing some research but not resolve
> this problem.

What is the content of:
/sources/glibc-2.28/build/stdlib/test-bz22786.test-result

You might see what happened there.

Pierre


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 06:32:11 -0600
From: Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Glibc-2.28 tests
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 01/13/2019 01:00 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> On 13/01/2019 07:15, Anonymous wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm getting some unexpected test failure in glibc(8.3-systemd, chapter 6.9)
>> make check result:
>> Summary of test results:
>> 3 FAIL
>> 5837 PASS
>> 17 UNSUPPORTED
>> 17 XFAIL
>> 2 XPASS
>>
>> 3 Fail:
>> inet/tst-idna_name_classify
>> misc/tst-ttyname
>> stdlib/test-bz22786
> 
> I too have 3 FAIL, but the third one is not the same (nptl/tst-eintr1). I felt
> safe to continue. I think you should be safe too...

I agree.  I also have the first two failures, but my third is 
posix/tst-spawn. There are over 5800 tests for glibc.  An isolated 
failure can be caused by many things and these tests often are for 
extreme conditions.

Looking at the stdlib/test-bz22786 code, it is trying to allocate 
(size_t) INT_MAX + 1 bytes.  A failure may depend on the amount of 
memory available.

I would not be concerned about this isolated test failure.

   -- Bruce


>>
>> inet/tst-idna_name_classify and misc/tst-ttyname are mentioned in the book,
>> but not stdlib/test-bz22786.
>> My question is: test stdlib/test-bz22786 failed is safe to continue to
>> building LFS target system?
>> Also, have any method to fix this error, I doing some research but not 
>> resolve
>> this problem.
> 
> What is the content of:
> /sources/glibc-2.28/build/stdlib/test-bz22786.test-result
> 
> You might see what happened there.
> 
> Pierre
> 



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


------------------------------

End of lfs-support Digest, Vol 1064, Issue 1
********************************************
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to