On 2/14/19 6:38 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
In r11506, amongst the several upgrades including glibc was an
upgrade to ninja-1.9.0. As part of that, the LFS-specific patch to
restrict the number of jobs was discarded.
I don't recall seeing this mentioned, so I wonder why ? I've
certainly mentioned it on the qtwebengine page, and it makes
measuring for 4 cores a lot easier on a machine with more.
ĸen
I was about to ask this myself - what happened with this?
For some of my systems, this will lead to fatal consequences if I don't
find a way to *safely* turn off CPU cores without the risk of killing
the system in the process. This patch made it a lot easier.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
