On 2019-03-04 08:57 -0600，Bruce Dubbs写道： > On 3/4/19 12:51 AM, niuneilneo wrote: > > Although it is a very tedious work to ensure the content being > > consistent with the section title, I find current LFS book of stable > > systemd is far from satisfaction. Just to name a few wrong mappings > > between the title and contents: > > > > Chapter 5.4: > > Title Binutils-2.32-Pass 1 with Binutils-2.31.1 - Pass 1;
That's impossible. I maintain a LFS Chinese translation and always recheck the package version after an update. > Where are you reading this? The title and contents are both > Binutils-2.32-Pass 1 > > > 5.6: > > Title Linux-4.20.12 API Headers with Linux-4.18.5 API Headers. > > This is consistent for me also. Are you mixing up the 8.3 and 8.4 releases? > > > What make things worse is the wget-list and md5sums file content of > > packages and patches in 3.1 are also inconsistent. > > There was a mixup in the sysV version of the md5sums, but that has been > fixed. > > > This inconsistency may come from the mixing usage of LFS book systemd > > version 8.3 and 84. So I suggest a thorough update of the stable > > systemdLFS book to reduce the confusion between different name and contents. > > It is possible that your browser remembered the old contents for some > URLs? 'stable' now points to 8.4 and a few days ago it pointed to 8.3. > Try refreshing any page that doesn't appear right. I had a look on the HTTP response header: > $ curl http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable-systemd/index.html -v > > /dev/null > % Total % Received % Xferd Average > Speed Time Time Time Current > Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--: > -- 0* Trying 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe70:25e8... > * TCP_NODELAY set > * Connected to www.linuxfromscratch.org (2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe70:25e8) port > 80 (#0) > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--: > -- 0> GET /lfs/view/stable-systemd/index.html HTTP/1.1 > > Host: www.linuxfromscratch.org > > User-Agent: curl/7.63.0 > > Accept: */* > > > < HTTP/1.1 200 OK > < Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 20:37:04 GMT > < Server: Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu) > < Last-Modified: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:56:01 GMT > < ETag: "706f-582f8d7687240" > < Accept-Ranges: bytes > < Content-Length: 28783 > < Vary: Accept-Encoding > < Content-Type: text/html > < > { [1165 bytes data] > 100 28783 100 28783 0 0 51767 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 51675 > * Connection #0 to host www.linuxfromscratch.org left intact There are no "Expires" or "cache-control" headers so it's possible. We can add "Expires: 2019-08-31 00:00:00" for "/lfs/view/stable{,-systemd}/*" to tell the browser to revalidate the cache for LFS-8.5. And, "/lfs/view/{development,systemd}/*" may need "cache-control: no-cache". -- Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
