On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:07:38PM +0530, Vineet Jain wrote: > At the fag end of the LFS constructio I have I test failure in the eudev > The test that fails is udev-test.pl > Tried looking into the test-suit.log file also but no clue as to how to > correct so that it passes. > The published log files shows as a passed test case. > > Should I go ahead with the installation ? > > Attached is the log file if it helps. > > -- > Vineet
> ====================================== > eudev 3.2.7: test/test-suite.log > ====================================== > > # TOTAL: 2 > # PASS: 1 > # SKIP: 0 > # XFAIL: 0 > # FAIL: 1 > # XPASS: 0 > # ERROR: 0 > > .. contents:: :depth: 2 > > FAIL: udev-test.pl > ================== > > > udev-test will run 136 tests: > [...] Looks like this test caused the failure > > TEST 30: program with subshell > device > '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda/sda5' > expecting node/link 'bar9' > open /dev/null failed: No such file or directory > add: error > Can't exec "tree": No such file or directory at ./udev-test.pl line 1436. > > remove: ok [...] > > 1 errors occurred > > FAIL udev-test.pl (exit status: 1) > I've no idea why this test failed for you, for me it gets 'ok' on 'add:'. But I would not worry and just install it. Thi reminds me that *many* years ago, in the early days of CLFS, Jim (?) added 'tree' to the CLFS book for this (eudev is developed on gentoo where tree is probably always installed). Matt (?) was not at all keen on adding it to LFS and I think identified a problem in the testsuite for that much-earlier version of eudev. ĸen -- Before the universe began, there was a sound. It went: "One, two, ONE, two, three, four" [...] The cataclysmic power chord that followed was the creation of time and space and matter and it does Not Fade Away. - wiki.lspace.org/mediawiki/Music_With_Rocks_In -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
