On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:21:24PM -0500, Trent wrote:
>
>
> I went back last night and booted the version 8.4 to look. And yes I see it
> was the same as version 9.
>
>
> I also compared the config.log from gcc-8.2.0 to gcc-9.2.0. I see something
> suspect which could be the issue
>
>
> From gcc-8.2.0:
>
>
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.2.0/lto-wrapper
> Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --enable-languages=c,c++
> --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap --disable-libmpx --with-system-zlib
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 8.2.0 (GCC)
>
>
> and gcc-9.2.0:
>
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/tools/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.2.0/lto-wrapper
> Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/tools --with-local-prefix=/tools
> --with-native-system-header-dir=/tools/include --enable-languages=c,c++
> --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap
> --disable-libgomp
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 9.2.0 (GCC)
>
>
> As I mentioned, I am not sure is that is correct or not, but the failure
> occurred shortly after this as it could not find the files configure needed.
>
> I can put both files on pastebin if you want.
>
>
> Thanks again!
>
I don't have files to compare that to (I do not keep the source
directories after a build, only the tarballs) and generally my
comments are to help people find the problem for themself, so using
pastebin will not gain anything from me.
You have apparently built 8.4, so you should be able to look at the
log file and find the error message which triggered the report about
versions of gmp etc. The error message ought to narrow down what is
failing. Perhaps the /tools items above are relevant, perhaps not.
ĸen
--
Truth, in front of her huge walk-in wardrobe, selected black leather
boots with stiletto heels for such a barefaced truth.
- Unseen Academicals
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
