On 11/10/2019 23:45, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> ---------- Original Message ----------
> From: "Paul Rogers" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Gcc Compiling Problem in 32 bit
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 18:14:44 -0700
> 
>> Paul,
>>
>> first, well-spotted that ext4 is inappropriate for such old kernels
>> - I had completely overlooked that.
>>
>> But a 2.6 kernel (if that is what that old knoppix version is
>> offering) should support ext3.  A quick look at wikipedia (as
>> always, "it might be accurate, or else someone with an agenda might
>> have updated it") suggests that ext3 was mainlined in 2.4.15.
> 
> ext2 will always work with this old kit.  Afterwards it's trivial to upgrade
> to ext3, once everything is built, tested, backed-up, and stable.  "One step
> at a time!"  
> 
>> Hi Paul and Everyone;
>>  
>> I am sorry that I am upsetting You, but, I don't always remember when
>> everything came out, I know that the Kernel will be a 2.6 something..
> 
> It takes a great deal to anger me.  My emotions are very well controlled.
> 
> However, I've critiqued your apparent lack of certainty and clarity at least a
> couple times, maybe more, but it never seems to change.  Who's going to suffer
> from it?  Not me, but you will--my half-century of working with computers make
> me quite certain of that.
> 
>>> 3) download and burn a Knoppix-5.x LIVE iso,
>>  
>>  
>> I can download that, somewhere I have a Knoppix Disk, but, I am not
>> sure what version it is, so I will Download it..
> 
> 
> "Somewhere"?  "not sure what version"?  QED.
> 
> If you're going to build LFS successfully you're going to haveto change how
> you work.
> 
> 
>> I have downloaded Knoppix 5.1.1, but I couldn't get it to boot, it says
>> no boot record..
> 
> You need an "image" file and you don't burn it as a file, as you do most
> things.  There's a different process, much like "dd".
> 
>>  
>> BUT, while cleaning in my room, I found a four CD set of Slackware 4.0,
>> with a Kernel of 2.2.6..
> 
> If you can boot it and get a shell...
> 
>>  
>> Right now it is Checking and Formatting the Hard Drive on the 586,
>> running on the 586
>>  
>> File type is ext2 with 1K blocks and 1 inode per 1024 bytes..
>>  
>> I hope that this is about what You would be OK with for checking out
>> the Hard Drive..
> 
> Maybe.  You used "mke2fs -c ..."?  A "normal" mke2fs doesn't do a surface
> scan, and since that drive may be bad, you need every sector checked.
> 
>>  
>> Also, from what I can see (so far) this might work for my Host, or is
>> it too old of a Kernel to make this work..
> 
> What does the book say?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paul Rogers
> [email protected]
> Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates."
> (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
> --
> 
>  
> 
> Hi All;
> 
>  
> 
> Paul and everyone;
> 
> "Somewhere"? "not sure what version"? QED. If you're going to build LFS
> successfully you're going to haveto change how you work.
> I was just mentioning that I remembered I had a copy of Knoppix on a CD..
> 
> I knew I would have to find it and see what version I had,
> 
> You may be blessed with a memory that would remember these things,
> but, I feel good if I can remember just that I have it, I can then go and find
> it,
> which I did.. > I have downloaded Knoppix 5.1.1, but I couldn't get it to
> boot, it says > no boot record.. You need an "image" file and you don't burn
> it as a file, as you do most things. There's a different process, much like 
> "dd".
> 
> I did just like I had done before with the many of CD/DVD's,
> that I have done to burn an Image..
> I had downloaded the .ISO image and burned it to disk, only it didn't work
> with the Knoppix 5.1.1 that I had, maybe even though it had the correct type
> it wasn't or didn't have the boot information.. Maybe it wasn't a bootable ISO
> Image file..
> 
> If you're going to build LFS successfully you're going to have to change how
> you work.
> 
> It's not that I can't follow Instructions, I just don't always remember exact
> details when I am answering emails like to You..
>  
> But, when I am building I have the Terminal emulation on one side (left) and
> the PDF file of the Linux From Scratch on the right hand side, and I do a copy
> and Paste sort of thing..

Whatever the other problems running old hardware you may have, you shouldn't
copy-paste from pdf, you ought to use html (in a browser, of course). The
point is that, when copying from pdf, spaces at the end of line may be added.
This is usually harmless, but when there is a continuation character (a
backslash), it makes a big difference:
try

MYVAR=something \
env | grep MYVAR

compared to:

MYVAR=something \<space>
env | grep MYVAR

Pierre
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to