---------- Original Message ---------- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Gcc Compiling Problem in 32 bit Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:21:06 GMT
---------- Original Message ---------- From: "Paul Rogers" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Gcc Compiling Problem in 32 bit Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 09:03:26 -0700 > Yes, Linux Mint 5 did pass all of the requirements of Chapter 4, and > the fact that I like Linux Mint , was what made it so appealing to me, > for this project.. Why? The only advantage Mint has over any other distro is its desktop. For building LFS that is irrelevant, even something of a disadvantage! All the instructions in the book are bash commands. At best you'll be working in a terminal emulator, where you'll have X, the desktop, and the emulator stealing processor power and adding a possible source of interference, contamination and confusion. The closer you can get to "bare iron" the better off you'll be, out of X and at the bash command line. That means no "cut and paste". As I wrote before, I recommend doing all that "in preparation", making bash scripts for each package. I spend *weeks* doing that for both LFS and BLFS before building any package, even laying down the root directory tree. (There are 418 scripts in my build directory for this system. (I put a sequence number in each name to keep it straight which one comes next.)) After all, once you build LFS, you'll want to boot it to build all the BLFS packages in your pure, clean, uncontaminated LFS, and it'll be a long time before you'll have X! It's like being a cook in a Chinese restaurant--they spend hours preparing ingredients, *before* they blast flame at a wok, heat oil, dump in ingredients and stir like mad, cooking each dish in just a minute or so. When I have to go back and startover, which STILL can happen, it's *WAY* faster than cut and paste, and provides perfect documentation how the system was built--both great advantages! If you "like" Mint for building LFS, you've already started on the wrong foot. -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) --Hi Paul; "" As I wrote before, I recommend doing all that "in preparation", making bash scripts for each package. I spend *weeks* doing that for both LFS and BLFS before building any package, even laying down the root directory tree. (There are 418 scripts in my build directory for this system. (I put a sequence number in each name to keep it straight which one comes next.)) "" I don't know 'How to do that' Would You Please give me some examples ?? "" At best you'll be working in a terminal emulator, where you'll have X, the desktop, and the emulator stealing processor power and adding a possible source of interference, contamination and confusion. The closer you can get to "bare iron" the better off you'll be, out of X and at the bash command line. "" I didn't Realize that, but Now I see (Understand).. Also as a side note, I changed my Memory Sticks and instead of 393216 KB, I now have 524288 KB of Memory.. Which explains alot.. THANK YOU Marty P. S., I am currently running Memtest86 4.3.7.. And I will try LFS Live CD 6.3, again, and see about making my way thru that.. THANK YOU Marty http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style ____________________________________________________________ 1 Trick "Kills" ED - Wives Are Speechless Med Journal http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5da4cadf9795d4adf6d96st01duc
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
