On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 04:00:12PM -0700, Flareon Zulu wrote: > > > The only thing that I can think of is that there's a chance the header > > > isn't > > > being generated correctly by autoconf after patching, but that package was > > > installed exactly to the book, with no problems. > > > > > > Flareon
Since nobody else has chimed in - My first suggestion is to try the patch and then use 'make -V1'. That should give the actual commandline which is used. > > > > and later it got linked into libcoreutils.a: > > > > gcc -O3 -march=native -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong > > -Wl,--as-needed -o src/expand src/expand.o src/expand-common.o > > src/libver.a lib/libcoreutils.a lib/libcoreutils.a > > The '-O3 -march=native -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong' is my addition, but it might be interesting to see if your build picks up something else there (I'm guessing -O2 -g but who knows). My second suggestion is to press on without the patch. If the LFS build completes, and boots, you could then retry building coreutils on the running system with the patch. ĸen -- Whilst all mushrooms are edible, the trick is to eat only those which will prove to be edible more than once. The Celebrated Discworld Almanak recommends you play safe and eat beans on toast. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
