Le 27/11/2019 à 17:40, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Restarting previous thread as a new discussion.
> 
>> On 2019-11-26 14:56 -0600, Douglas R. Reno wrote:
>>>> On 2019-11-26 14:39, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 
>>>> Also, I am running into an issue I haven't noticed before.  On my
>>>> existing system if I try to log in as user lfs with .bash_profile
>>>> set,
>>>> it automatically starts bash and then puts it into the background.
>>>>
>>>> # su - lfs
>>>> [1]+  Stopped                 su - lfs
>>>> # jobs
>>>> [1]+  Stopped                 su - lfs
>>>> # fg
>>>> su - lfs
>>>> lfs:~$
>>>>
>>>> The rules in the book work OK as .bash_profile is not present when
>>>> we
>>>> initially change to user lfs and then we source
>>>> .bash_profile.  That
>>>> works.
>>>>
>>>> It could have something to do with PAM and su, but I'm not
>>>> sure.  Has
>>>> anyone else seen this?
> 
>>> Yes I have, it's happening on Debian 10 and on LFS now. I'm not sure
>>> what's causing it
>>
>> I've seen this on LFS.  Not sure the reason.
> 
> I've investigated this a bit.  The problem is in su after pam is installed.  I
> rebuilt shadow using --without-libpam and copied that to /bin (ensuring it was
> suid).  The our 'su - lfs' then worked perfectly.
> 
> I did some initial trials to see if changing some of the /etc/pam.d/su
> configuration items were causing the problem, but changing /etc/pam.d/su to:
> 
> auth            required        pam_permit.so
> account         required        pam_permit.so
> session         required        pam_permit.so
> password        required        pam_permit.so
> 
> still causes putting 'su - lfs' in the background.  This makes me think the
> problem is in su, but it could be something in bash-5.

On debian (where I see this problem on a fresh install, but not on an old (but
updated) install), they use su from util-linux. So the problem might not be su.

Note that the bash startup files are the same in both debian installations.

Pierre

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Do not top post on this list.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Reply via email to