On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 05:11:18PM -0500, Scott Andrews wrote: > > On 1/4/20 1:45 PM, Flareon Zulu wrote: > > > > On January 4, 2020, at 09:47, Scott Andrews > > <scott.andr...@columbus.rr.com> wrote: > > > > >Anyone have this error? > > >ar cr libgrep.a glthread/lock.o glthread/threadlib.o kwset.o m-fgrep.o > > >m-regex.o mbrlen.o regex.o > > >ranlib libgrep.a > > >make[3]: Leaving directory > > >'/mnt/lfs/source/gettext-0.20.1/gettext-tools/libgrep' > > >Making all in src > > >here=`pwd`; \ > > >cd ../../libtextstyle/lib && \ > > > /usr/bin/make install-nobase_includeHEADERS > > >install-nobase_nodist_includeHEADERS includedir="$here" > > >make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'install-nobase_includeHEADERS'. > > Stop. > > >make[2]: *** [Makefile:3955: textstyle.h] Error 2 > > >make[1]: *** [Makefile:2173: all-recursive] Error 1 > > >make: *** [Makefile:2041: all] Error 2 > > >Didn't see anything on the list about this > > >Gettext-0.19.8.1 is ok > > >--
> > > > Especially in light of this: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?56333 > > > > It seems there could be an issue with build order, essentially. I didn't > > have an issue, but some people online have had this happen, they're just > > not on this list. > > > > Flareon Zulu > > > Could very well be, I will follow up on the link you posted and see if I > caqn make sense in it. > > The usual workaround for what that sounds like is "make -j1". Apologies if you are already doing that. My most recent example of that was in bison on a Skylake (an i3 so I'd been running make -j4 : perhaps -j3 or -j2 might have sufficed). On other machines (haswell i7, ryzen 3400G) make -j8 was fine. Modern CPUs can be a pain. And that is another thing to learn from LFS - ISTR that dropping back to -j1 in case of problems is mentioned in the FAQ. ĸen -- The right of the people to keep and arm Bears, shall not be infringed. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
