Ended up starting over. That's why we liKE backups. On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, at 3:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Send lfs-support mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lfs-support digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. ld-new missing (Mark Dymek) > 2. Re: ld-new missing (Ken Moffat) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:42:14 -0500 > From: Mark Dymek <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: [lfs-support] ld-new missing > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > so i'm stuck at adjusting the toolchain ld-new is missing so making a > link to /tools/bin fails. i found a previous email about this and it > seems like the advice was to ignore it? this message was from 2006 is > that still safe to do? how would i go about build ld-new? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:21:59 +0000 > From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]> > To: LFS Support List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] ld-new missing > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:42:14PM -0500, Mark Dymek wrote: > > so i'm stuck at adjusting the toolchain ld-new is missing so making a > > link to /tools/bin fails. i found a previous email about this and it > > seems like the advice was to ignore it? this message was from 2006 is > > that still safe to do? how would i go about build ld-new? > > > That sounds like bad advice (might work, might keep you relying on > /tools even after LFS is finished). > > ld-new comes from binutils pass2 (after 'make install'). > > But you are now in a position where you might want to keep what you > have in /tools. Some people may tell you that the correct procedure > is to start over and "Follow Book, Book Good" (i.e. don't omit > anything). But if this was your only omission, perhaps you could do > something like this after exiting from chroot AND from user lfs - > > As root, probably: > > mv -v /mnt/lfs/tools /mnt/lfs/tools.good > mkdir /mnt/lfs/tools, repeat setting up the environment, and again as user > lfs (in a fresh session) do everything up to the end of binutils > pass2. Exit from user lfs. > > Then, as root: > cp -v /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/ld-new to /mnt/lfs/tools.good/bin/ld-new > mv -v /mnt/lfs/tools{,.minimal} > mv -v /mnt/lfs/tools{.good,} > ls -l /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/ld-new > > If ok , reenter chroot. > > Not tested, I might very well be missing something. > > If you have a fast machine, I would be inclined to just start over > and pay attention to all the instructions in each package. > > ĸen > -- > We hope and trust that our valued and loyal customers will bear with > us in the coming months as we interact synergistically with change > management in our striving for excellence. That is our mission. > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > > ------------------------------ > > End of lfs-support Digest, Vol 1264, Issue 1 > ******************************************** >
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
